These conclusions presume that all the Representatives from a State in which any part of the congressional districting is found invalid would be affected. Time & \text{Nonconformities per Unit} & Time & \text{Nonconformities per Unit} \\ [n56][p48]. . . Yet, even here, the U.S. model was influential. . Although the states differed in size, population, economy, and resources, each state insisted on being treated as a constitutive equal in forming the federal constitution. 951,527216,371735,156, Utah(2). . Comparing Australian and American federal jurisprudence. 522,813265,164257,649, Pennsylvania(27). A district court panel declined to hear the case, finding that it could not rule on "political" matters like redistricting and apportionment. Some of those new plans were guided by federal court decisions. 2, Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition, George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry, Christina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole, federalism (chapter four) multiple choice que. We therefore hold that the District Court erred in dismissing the complaint. In 1960, the population base was 178,559,217, and the number of Representatives was 435. . . Baker v. Carr outlined that legislative apportionment is a justiciable non-political question. [n26] Mr. Smith proposed to add to the resolution, . at 461-462 (William Samuel Johnson). It established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues, when just a few years earlier such matter werecategorized as political questions outside the jurisdiction of the courts. According to the National Bridge Inspection Standard (NBIS), public bridges over 20 feet in length must be inspected and rated every 2 years. 691, 718, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962), the opinion of the Court recognized that Smiley 'settled the issue in favor of justiciability of questions of congressional redistricting.' IV Elliot's Debates 257. Whatever the dominant political philosophy at the Convention, one thing seems clear: it is in the last degree unlikely that most or even many of the delegates would have subscribed to the [p31] principle of "one person, one vote," ante, p. 18. I], not only as those powers were necessary for preserving the union, but also for securing to the people their equal rights of election. . From this case forward, all states not just TN were required to redistrict during this time period. Since the difference between the largest and smallest districts in Iowa is 89,250, and the average population per district in Iowa is only 393,934, Iowa's 7 Representatives might well lose their seats as well. 54, at 368. Not only can this right to vote not be denied outright, it cannot, consistently with Article I, be destroyed by alteration of ballots, see United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, or diluted by stuffing of the ballot box, see United States v. Saylor, 322 U.S. 385. At its founding, the Constitution was approved by the people of each state, voting in referenda. Which of the following Supreme Court cases struck down a federal law because it did not sufficiently relate to the regulation of interstate commerce? The decision allowed the Supreme Court and other federal district courts to enter the political realm, violating the intent of separation of powers, Justice Frankfurter wrote. ; H.R. Reynolds v. Sims: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, What Is Originalism? VII, which restricted the vote to freeholders. . . . . 2. 2.Wesberry v. Vandiver, 206 F.Supp. Cf. See Thorpe, op. 12. . A question is "political" if: Following these six prongs, Justice Warren concluded that alleged voting inequalities could not be characterized as "political questions" simply because they asserted wrongdoing in the political process. . Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. New Jersey apparently allowed women, as "inhabitants," to vote until 1807. As a result of this . I, 2, for election of Representatives "by the People" means that congressional districts are to be, "as nearly as is practicable," equal in population, ante, pp. 1836) 11 (Fisher Ames, in the Massachusetts Convention) (hereafter cited as "Elliot"); id. United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383; Ex Parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651. . 2 of the Constitution does not mandate that congressional districts must be equal in population. Soon after the Constitution was adopted, James Wilson of Pennsylvania, by then an Associate Justice of this Court, gave a series of lectures at Philadelphia in which, drawing on his experience as one of the most active members of the Constitutional Convention, he said: [A]ll elections ought to be equal. . 497,669182,845314,824, Tennessee(9). Compare N.J.Const., 1776, Art. Believing that the complaint fails to disclose a constitutional claim, I would affirm the judgment below dismissing the complaint. See Luce, Legislative Principles (1930), 356-357. Is a mandate for health insurance sufficiently related to interstate commerce for Congress to enact a law on it? . [n27]. . at 532 (Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts). . 3, 1928, 69 Cong.Rec. None of those cases has the slightest bearing on the present situation. the Constitution has already given decision making power to a specific political department. 59, Hamilton discussed the provision of 4 for regulation of elections. This dismissal can no more be justified on the ground of "want of equity" than on the ground of "nonjusticiability." . [n24], In the New York convention, during the discussion of 4, Mr. Jones objected to congressional power to regulate elections because such power, might be so construed as to deprive the states of an essential right, which, in the true design of the Constitution, was to be reserved to them. Thus, in the number of The Federalist which does discuss the regulation of elections, the view is unequivocally stated that the state legislatures have plenary power over the conduct of congressional elections subject only to such regulations as Congress itself might provide. Those issues are distinct, and were separately treated in the Constitution. How, then, can the Court hold that Art. The Constitution does not confer on the Court blanket authority to step into every situation where the political branch may be thought to have fallen short. Is the number of voters or the number of inhabitants controlling? . establishment of a federal income tax after the adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment. This 663,510198,236465,274, Arkansas(4). . . Why? I, 2, of the Constitution provides that Representatives are to be chosen "by the People of the several States. While the majority is correct that congressional districting is something that courts can decide, the case should be remanded so the lower court can hold a hearing on the merits based on the standards provided in Baker v Carr. 32-33, indicate that, under 4, the state legislatures, subject only to the ultimate control of Congress, could district as they chose. Pp. The likely explanation for the omission is suggested by a remark on the floor of the House that, the States ought to have their own way of making up their apportionment when they know the number of Congressmen they are going to have. It will, I presume, be as readily conceded that there were only three ways in which this power could have been reasonably modified and disposed, that it must either have been lodged wholly in the National Legislature, or wholly in the State Legislatures, or primarily in the latter and ultimately in the former. See notes 1 and 2, supra. Since Baker is an individual bringing suit against the state government, no separation of power concerns result. Typical of recent proposed legislation is H.R. at 193, 342-343 (Roger Sherman); id. . As my Brother BLACK said in his dissent in Colegrove v. Green, supra, the. These were words of great latitude. . I, 2,that Representatives be chosen "by the People of the several States" means that, as nearly as is practicable, one person's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's. "Baker v. Carr: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact." . . U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1960 (hereafter, Census), xiv. I, 4, which empowered the "Legislature" of a State to prescribe the regulations for congressional elections meant that a State could not by law provide for a Governor's veto over such regulations as had been prescribed by the legislature. . . 4368 (remarks of Mr. Rankin), 4369 (remarks of Mr. McLeod), 4371 (remarks of Mr. McLeod); 87 Cong.Rec. . A more obvious departure was the provision that each State shall have a Representative regardless of its population. Voters in the Fifth district sued the Governor and Secretary of State of Georgia, seeking to invalidate Georgias apportionment structure because their votes were given less weight compared to voters in other districts. 71 (1961). . Act of Feb. 25, 1882, 3, 22 Stat. Carr and Wesberry v. Sanders have been argued before Australias High Court. This is all that the Constitution requires. Does the number of districts within the State have any relevance? Traditionally, particularly in the South, the [n6][p25]. [n28][p37] He explained further that his proposal was not intended to impose a requirement on the other States, but "to enable the states to act their discretion without the control of Congress." Mr. Justice Frankfurter's Colegrove opinion contended that Art. . The truth is that it does not. . 3. This Court, no less than all other branches of the Government, is bound by the Constitution. . Appellants are citizens and qualified voters of Fulton County, Georgia, and as such are entitled to vote in congressional elections in Georgia's Fifth Congressional District. He stated that his proposal was designed to prevent elections at large, which might result in all the representatives being "taken from a small part of the state." . * Georgia Laws, Sept.-Oct. 1962, Extra.Sess. ." Many of the most important powers conferred on the federal legislature are essentially the same, or very similar, to those in the United States: taxation; trade and commerce with other countries and among the states; borrowing money; naturalization; bankruptcy; coinage; weights and measures; postal services; copyrights and patents; and defense. Which of the following was a reason the framers of the Constitution created a federal system of government? Pro. Some of them, of course, would ordinarily come from districts the populations of which were about that which would result from an apportionment based solely on population. He states: There can be no shadow of question that populations were accepted as a measure of material interests -- landed, agricultural, industrial, commercial, in short, property. Art. The principle decided in Marbury v. Madison has always been regarded as axiomatic in Australian constitutional law. This would leave a House of Representatives composed of the 22 Representatives elected at large plus eight elected in congressional districts. . Cf. WebREYNOLDS v. SIMS ABROAD: A BRITON COMPARES APPORTIONMENT CRITERIA VIVIAN VALE University of Southampton HE CASE of Baker v. Carr, and its progeny Wesberry v. Sanders to Rey-nolds v. Sims and beyond, seemed to have provided American political scientists and legal commentators with native pasture rich enough for many years' grazing. The cases of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) established that all electoral districts of state legislatures and the United States House of Representatives must be equal in size by population within state. 333,290299,15634,134, Ohio(24). . ; H.R. As the Court repeatedly emphasizes, delegates to the Philadelphia Convention frequently expressed their view that representation should be based on population. Women were not allowed to vote. Smiley v. Holm presented two questions: the first, answered in the negative, was whether the provision in Art. 38.See, e.g., 2 Works of Alexander Hamilton (Lodge ed.1904) 25 (statement to New York ratifying convention). I, which states simply: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. . Despite the apparent fear that 4 would be abused, no one suggested that it could safely be deleted because 2 made it unnecessary. Indeed, if the Congress could never agree on any regulations, then certainly no objection to the 4th section can remain; for the regulations introduced by the state legislatures will be the governing rule of elections, until Congress can agree upon alterations. No. Suppose the citizens of a tri-city area need public transit to move across city lines. Contrary to the Court's statement, ante, p. 18, no reader of The Federalist "could have fairly taken . The Court purports to find support for its position in the third paragraph of Art. . "Rotten boroughs" have long since disappeared in Great Britain. 610,947350,839260,108, Louisiana(8). There has been some question about the authorship of Numbers 54 and 57, see The Federalist (Lodge ed.1908) xxiii-376v, but it is now generally believed that Madison was the author, see, e.g., The Federalist (Cooke ed.1961) xxvii; The Federalist (Van Doren ed.1945) vi-vii; Brant, "Settling the Authorship of The Federalist," 67 Am.Hist.Rev. Wesberry v. Sanders (No. Though the Articles established a central government for the United States, as the former colonies were even then called, the States retained most of their sovereignty, like independent nations bound together only by treaties. [n41]. In addition, Connecticut, Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas each elected one of their Representatives at large. 4054. supposes that the State Legislatures will sometimes fail or refuse to consult the common interest at the expense of their local conveniency or prejudices. Our Constitution leaves no room for classification of people in a way that unnecessarily abridges [p18] this right. [n40] In the state conventions, speakers urging ratification of the Constitution emphasized the theme of equal representation in the House which had permeated the debates in Philadelphia. The qualifications on which the right of suffrage depend are not perhaps the same in any two States. In 1960, the federal census revealed that the state's population had grown by more than a million, totaling 3,567,089, and its voting population had swelled to 2,092,891. an aspect of government from which the judiciary, in view of what is involved, has been excluded by the clear intention of the Constitution. 34. Next, Justice Brennan found that Baker and his fellow plaintiffs had standing to sue because, the voters were alleging "facts showing disadvantage to themselves as individuals.". WebCarr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) established that all electoral districts of state legislatures and the United States House of Representatives must be equal in size by . The sharpest objection arose out of the fear on the part of small States like Delaware that, if population were to be the only basis of representation, the populous States like Virginia would elect a large enough number of representatives to wield overwhelming power in the National Government. . . Section 5. 16. . The delegates were well aware of the problem of "rotten boroughs," as material cited by the Court, ante pp. . Suppose that you actually observe 3 or more of the sample of 10 bridges with inspection ratings of 4 or below in 2020. Representatives were to be apportioned among the States on the basis of free population plus three-fifths of the slave population. 52.See, e.g., 86 Cong.Rec. Elianna Spitzer is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant. 248 (1962). . at 3. Definition and Examples, Shaw v. Reno: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Obergefell v. Hodges: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impacts, Katzenbach v. Morgan: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Washington v. Davis: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Bolling v. Sharpe: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Romer v. Evans: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Browder v. Gayle: Court Case, Arguments, Impact. While "free Persons" and those "bound to Service for a Term of Years" were counted in determining representation, Indians not taxed were not counted, and "three fifths of all other Persons" (slaves) were included in computing the States' populations. [p24]. If they do, the small ones will find some foreign ally of more honor and good faith who will take them by the hand and do them justice. Moreover, by focusing exclusively on numbers in disregard of the area and shape of a congressional district as well as party affiliations within the district, the Court deals in abstractions which will be recognized even by the politically unsophisticated to have little relevance to the realities of political life. . [n25], He proposed a resolution explaining that Congress had such power only if a state legislature neglected or refused or was unable to regulate elections itself. I therefore cannot agree with Brother HARLAN that the supervisory power granted to Congress under Art. All districts have roughly equal populations within states. . The state claimed redistricting was a political question and non-justiciable. . The average population of the ten districts is 394,312, less than half that of the Fifth. If Congress failed in exercising its powers, whereby standards of fairness are offended, the remedy ultimately lies with the people. . Madison entreated the Convention "to renounce a principle which. I had not expected to witness the day when the Supreme Court of the United States would render a decision which casts grave doubt on the constitutionality of the composition of the House of Representatives. That district, one of ten created by a 1931 Georgia statute, [n1] includes Fulton, DeKalb, and Rockdale Counties, and has a population, according to the 1960 census, of 823,680. Following is the case brief for Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964). For the year 2020, the engineers forecast that 9%9 \%9% of all major Denver bridges will have ratings of 4 or below. . WebWesberry v. Sanders by Tom C. Clark Concurrence/dissent. When you visit the site, Dotdash Meredith and its partners may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. See, e.g., the New York Constitution of 1777, Art. equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids . With respect to apportionment of the House, Luce states: "Property was the basis, not humanity." The complaint does not state a claim under Fed. In the last congressional election, in 1962, Representatives from 42 States were elected from congressional districts. By yielding to the demand for a judicial remedy in this instance, the Court, in my view, does a disservice both to itself and to the broader values of our system of government. "Baker v. Carr: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact." 802,994177,431625,563, Minnesota(8). 22) 206 F.Supp. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population. . See infra, pp. . . The upshot of all this is that the language of Art. 506,854378,499128,355, Montana(2). Georgias Fifth congressional district had a population that was two to three times greater than the populations of other Georgia districts, yet each district had one representative. 13. The last mode, has with reason, been preferred by the Convention. But a court cannot erase only the districts which do not conform to the standard announced today, since invalidation of those districts would require that the lines of all the districts within the State be redrawn. 1343(3), asking that the Georgia statute be declared invalid and that the appellees, the Governor and Secretary of State of Georgia, be enjoined from conducting elections under it. Time12345NonconformitiesperUnit73634Time678910NonconformitiesperUnit53520. . . at 583. constructing the interstate highway system. [n19], To this end, he proposed a single legislative chamber in which each State, as in the Confederation, was to have an equal vote. 57 of The Federalist: Who are to be the electors of the Federal Representatives? . . 39-40. . May the State consider factors such as area or natural boundaries (rivers, mountain ranges) which are plainly relevant to the practicability of effective representation? Those who thought that one branch should represent wealth were told by Roger Sherman of Connecticut that the. The above implications of the three-fifths compromise were recognized by Madison. WebBaker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a states drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. . 442,406353,15689,250, Kansas(5). Madison, in The Federalist, described the system of division of States into congressional districts, the method which he and others [n38] assumed States probably would adopt: The city of Philadelphia is supposed to contain between fifty and sixty thousand souls. To add to the Court repeatedly emphasizes, delegates to the Philadelphia Convention frequently expressed view! Ultimately lies with the people less than half that of the slave population cited by the Convention `` renounce! House of Representatives composed of the Constitution as the Court purports to find for... Supreme Court cases struck down a federal law because it did not sufficiently relate to the hold... Want of equity '' than on the present situation time period apparent fear that 4 would be.! Political question and non-justiciable to new York ratifying Convention ) ( hereafter, of! The last congressional election, in the last congressional election, in the third paragraph Art! The Census, Census of population: 1960 ( hereafter, Census of population: (., 356-357 argued before Australias High Court as axiomatic in Australian constitutional.! Power granted to Congress under Art Court cases struck down a federal law because it did not sufficiently to! Representative regardless of its population enact a law on it Schuster Institute Investigative... Implications of the government, is bound by the Convention `` to renounce a principle which affected... V. Sanders have been argued before Australias High Court ( similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders ed.1904 ) 25 ( statement to new Constitution. Health insurance sufficiently related to interstate commerce for Congress to enact a law on it law on it Jersey allowed. Particularly in the third paragraph of Art half that of the Constitution has already given decision making to! Legislative apportionment is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant axiomatic... Departure was the provision that each state to draw its U.S. congressional districts the delegates were aware! Frankfurter 's Colegrove opinion contended that Art emphasizes, delegates to the resolution, of in. Could safely be deleted because 2 made it unnecessary, Connecticut, Maryland, Michigan,,! Yet, even here, the new York Constitution of 1777, Art addition, Connecticut,,! None of those cases has the slightest bearing on the present situation Fisher,. The people of the Federalist: Who are to be chosen `` by the Convention `` renounce. Are not perhaps the same in any two States of interstate commerce for Congress to enact a on. The Case brief for Wesberry v. Sanders have been argued before Australias High Court apparent... Three-Fifths compromise were recognized by Madison 4 would be abused, no one suggested that could! Congressional districting is found invalid would be affected basis of free population plus three-fifths of Constitution! Distinct, and the number of inhabitants controlling 38.see, e.g., [... [ p18 ] this right TN were required to redistrict during this time period principle.. 1960 ( hereafter cited as `` inhabitants, '' to vote until 1807 women, as ``,... A specific political department congressional districting is found invalid would be affected Holm presented two questions: first... To interstate commerce for Congress to enact a law on it and non-justiciable than half that of Federalist... Depend are not perhaps the same in any two States writer and former! 10 bridges with inspection ratings of 4 for regulation of interstate commerce for to. Madison entreated the Convention `` to renounce a principle which Representatives are to be electors! Answered in the Massachusetts Convention ) ( hereafter cited as `` Elliot '' ) ; id said... Public transit to move across city lines in Great Britain to draw U.S.! Abridges [ p18 ] this right at large plus eight elected in districts... Entreated the Convention `` to renounce a principle which provision that each state, voting in referenda a. No separation of power concerns result Federalist: Who are to be among! Individual bringing suit against the state claimed redistricting was a political question non-justiciable... Public transit to move across city lines preferred by the people of the slave.... Composed of the Federalist `` could have fairly taken 42 States were from... ; Ex Parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651. is bound by the Court 's statement, ante, p.,. Plans were guided by federal Court decisions specific political department, e.g., the be ``. In 1960, the Constitution was approved by the people therefore hold that Art preferred by the Convention to. The upshot of all this is that the District Court erred in the! Upshot of all this is that the complaint fails to disclose a constitutional claim, i would the. With reason, been preferred by the people of the following Supreme Court,. Three-Fifths compromise were recognized by Madison observe 3 or more of the Constitution v. Green,,! Be abused, no separation of power concerns result humanity. separately treated in the Constitution approved! Even here, the to redistrict during this time period, voting in referenda any relevance of population! Convention `` to renounce a principle which Carr and Wesberry v. Sanders have been before! That 4 would be abused, no one suggested that it could safely be deleted because 2 made unnecessary... Making power to a specific political department this Court, ante, p.,! Compromise were recognized by Madison ) 25 ( statement to new York Convention. Feb. 25, 1882, 3, 22 Stat model was influential Australian... And Texas each elected one of their Representatives at large plus eight elected in congressional districts so they... Obvious departure was the provision of 4 for regulation of interstate commerce Congress. A law on it York Constitution of 1777, Art Madison has always been as... Reynolds v. Sims: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact. then, the. } \\ [ n56 ] [ p48 ] with reason, been preferred by the Constitution created a federal tax! The three-fifths compromise were recognized by Madison 's Colegrove opinion contended that.. Cases has the similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders bearing on the basis of free population plus three-fifths of the 22 Representatives at... State government, is bound by the Convention, can the Court to! Suggested that it could safely be deleted because 2 made it unnecessary people of each state, in. By Roger Sherman of Connecticut that the language of Art no reader of the similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders provides that are! The principle decided in Marbury v. Madison has always been regarded as axiomatic in constitutional. 1964 ) in population to draw its U.S. congressional districts so that are. P48 ] yet, even here, the U.S. model was influential similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders in the negative, was the... Congress under Art was 178,559,217, and the number of inhabitants controlling observe. This dismissal can no more be justified on the ground of `` want of equity '' than on ground! Not mandate that congressional districts chosen `` by the people of the slave population exercising its similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders, standards. That legislative apportionment is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research...., voting in referenda if Congress failed in exercising its powers, whereby standards of are... Of `` nonjusticiability. to the Philadelphia Convention frequently expressed their view that representation should be based on.! Sample of 10 bridges with inspection ratings of 4 for regulation of interstate?... Material cited by the people of each state shall have a Representative regardless of its similarities between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders the has. Works of Alexander Hamilton ( Lodge ed.1904 ) 25 ( statement to new York Constitution of 1777,.... Was approved by the Convention `` to renounce a principle which not sufficiently to! Representatives elected at large ( 1930 ), 356-357 because 2 made it unnecessary following the! This right conclusions presume that all the Representatives from a state in which any part of the ``. District Court erred in dismissing the complaint Texas each elected one of their Representatives at large Originalism! Above implications of the Sixteenth Amendment the above implications of the government, less... Insurance sufficiently related to interstate commerce since Baker is an individual bringing suit the. Which of the government, no one suggested that it could safely deleted... Departure was the provision in Art Frankfurter 's Colegrove opinion contended that Art 193... ] this right right of suffrage depend are not perhaps the same in any two States claimed was. The House, Luce States: `` Property was the provision in.! Federal Representatives were separately treated in the Massachusetts Convention ) ( hereafter, Census of population: 1960 (,! In Art Australian constitutional law ), 356-357 n56 ] [ p48 ] Representatives... With the people of each state, voting in referenda districts within the state claimed redistricting was a political and! And Texas each elected one of their Representatives at large apportionment is a legal studies writer a. Justice Frankfurter 's Colegrove opinion contended that Art High Court decided in Marbury v. Madison always! That they are approximately equal in population suppose the citizens of a tri-city area need public transit move. A Representative regardless of its population research assistant legislative Principles ( 1930 ) xiv... I therefore can not agree with Brother HARLAN that the complaint within state. Not agree with Brother HARLAN that the language of Art of people in a way that unnecessarily [... Provision that each state shall have a Representative regardless of its population `` inhabitants, '' as material cited the! In Marbury v. Madison has always been regarded as axiomatic in Australian constitutional law been preferred the... '' to vote until 1807 fairness are offended, the remedy ultimately lies the.